Blockchain Stand

I personally love and feel this domain name (oh I love others too). It literally means a Blockchain stand. You’ll always see stands in highly trafficked areas where they offer you things, but stands aren’t limited to trading on the high streets. Stands are also found in homes and offices where they are used to house items.

BlockchainStand.com is a good business name idea for products, services, information, or community with Blockchain as primary affair. The secondary keyword in the domain name is a valuable addition that conceptualises a place dedicated to Blockchain. Since a stand may further refer to a trading point, BlockchainStand’s potential expands.

I don’t know about your mind now, but I’ve got ideas. Blockchain is like the new ‘Internet’. There are hundreds of Cryptocurrency products and services already running on Blockchain. Non-cryptocurrency products abound on the Blockchain too. With all these, BlockchainStand is too powerful to ignore.

At 15 characters, the length is at the limits of the average length domain name. It has just entered IMHO the land of long. But Blockchain itself is 10 characters long. Much longer than an average word. Given that idea, I’ll say this domain name is not long.

Customers can’t confuse this name when you hear it. They’ll not have trouble spelling it or pronouncing it. Stand is a popular English word.

Features of a good business name (BlockchainStand)

• The name should not be long; this has 15 characters and that is because the main technology word (Blockchain) is 10 characters long.
• The name should be easy to understand, pronounce, and spell.
• Great keyword mix – Blockchain, and stand.
• Allows diverse business offerings – doesn’t restrict you.
• Attaches itself to the mind.

Branding tip #22

It is interesting to note that companies think that brand names are important, that the choice of an appropriate brand name is critical, and that certain attributes of brand names are desirable. Therefore, it comes as a surprise that most companies conducted very little brand
name testing. The importance ratings of the different brand name characteristics was in the 5+ range; the amount of testing done, however, on most criteria was in the 3+ range.

While up to 77% used a “quick and dirty” approach for evaluating names, focus groups or other qualitative methods were used by 45% firms. Only 35% of the companies used surveys or other quantitative approaches. For these companies, the average sample size used was 74. The amount of testing done is even less in the case of industrial goods. There were other significant differences between consumer and industrial goods companies. While only 9% of the consumer goods companies did not even do “quick and dirty” testing, 26% of industrial companies did not do any testing.

Focus groups were utilized by 62% consumer goods companies versus 3 7% for industrial goods companies. Quantitative surveys were used by 48% consumer goods companies and only by 29% of industrial goods companies.